Terra Mystica

Terra Mystica App Announced for 2017

Game developer Digidice announced at Spiel and on Twitter this past week that they are developing an app version of Terra Mystica, to be available in the first quarter of 2017.

 

I’ll be very interested to see how this one plays, as Terra Mystica is a notoriously long game:  one time through can monopolize an entire game night.  My favorite board game apps, unlike my favorite tabletop games, are able to be played in an under ten minute time frame, and I’m wondering if the Terra Mystica app will hit that window.

And if game play is rapid, will it satisfy the same strategy-loving gamers that have currently elevated the game to a fourth place ranking on BGG.com, and to a long list of awards that, when run in a single column, barely fit on my desktop screen?  Perhaps making the game more user friendly may make it small in other ways as well…

Thoughts on Splendor Online Play

Online play in the Splendor app is not yet a month old, and it appears to be, compared to other board games on mobile app stores, much healthier in terms of matching a bevy of eager players. It even seems easier to find other players than in the venerable Catan app, and it is much quicker to get the virtual table outfitted as well: from loading the app to picking your tokens takes less than a minute. Also, and most importantly, unlike all other mobile tabletop gaming apps that I own, the app forces players to stay involved by timing each player’s turn. In virtual Splendor, there are no agonizingly long three to five minute turns (although some players take an eon to realize that all they can do, if there are three short stacks, and there’s nothing they can afford or want to buy, is take three tokens or reserve a card). But if the other player’s timer does expire, congratulations! They just forfeited through being inattentive, and you won the game. This means that online Splendor, while slower than Splendor against AI, is much quicker than other games that feature online play.  However, it is still quicker than playing Splendor on a real-world tabletop, as most real-world players don’t use a timer, and there’s always that one Splendor player that takes two or three minute turns.

Possibly the most interesting aspect of this rapidity of play is that you are quickly introduced to a wide variety of Splendor strategies. I just finished playing a game with a player that started the game by reserving a red jewel card from the bottom row, and from then on in, was determined not to let me have any red jewel cards on the bottom row, so that whenever one would be placed, she would reserve it. As the green deck was top heavy with red cards, this meant that her first three turns required her to reserve three red cards in a row, so that while I quickly had a card and five tokens, she had three jokers and three reserved cards after the first three turns. Unfortunately for her, the next card placed in the bottom row was also a red token card, and as she had already reserved the maximum of three cards, and I had five tokens and a card, I was better suited to buying it before she did. I’m intensely interested in seeing how this kind of color monopolization strategy might work in another game in which the luck wasn’t as lopsided, but I will probably never play this way myself. I won this game 16 points to 10.

Another player closely scrutinized my till of tokens, so that whenever I was able to buy a point-scoring card, they would reserve it. This probably throws off other players’ games, but as I have played a lot of Splendor, and I have experience in diversifying my strategy, and they can only reserve three cards at most—cards that usually turned out to be useless to them, as they were saving very different colors than I was saving—I won 17 points to 5. However, I will admit to being more annoyed by this player than any other Splendor player, although the feeling was mitigated when I realized that they were stuck with three cards that did not match their game investments, which blocked their ability both to reserve cards and to get joker tokens for the rest of the game.

More than half of the players that I have played have reserved a card from the bottom row. Folks, this is a bonehead move, and tells the person across the table that you have no idea what you’re doing. I’ll allow the exception to this to be the color monopolization strategy I mentioned above, as I have only seen it used in one virtual game and no real-world tabletop games. Color monopolization on the bottom row may very well be a bonehead move as well, but I have little experience with the strategy to say either way. If your first three moves are to reserve a red card, a brown card, and a blue card, though, you’re definitely a mook, as the bottom row cards are inexpensive and plentiful, and are best purchased with a canny economy of three token draws and using prior purchases to make it cheaper to make future buys. Good Splendor players reserve around three cards per game, and they are usually three to five point cards. Sometimes a bottom row card might be reserved towards the end game if it is the color that a player needs to attract a noble.

spl01_annegood

For instance, if I have three green, three blue, and two white cards, and I need one more white to get the noble above, and the white card that costs three brown is drawn for the bottom row, reserving it to get the joker token to add to the two brown in my till will get me three points in the following turn—as long as another player is not about to take that noble.  This is usually the only instance in which I would reserve a card from the bottom row.

There are also the kind of players that you meet in real life, such as the Splendor Gamblers that like to reserve the cheap cards in the middle and top row as an opening move, for example the four point top row cards that only cost seven tokens of one color. While I almost never do this, and only reserve cards that I might play in a round or two, and very rarely reserve compeititively (taking a winning card from another player that will also give me the joker token I need to squeeze out a big purchase), when I see a player reserve a cheap card, it tells me that they know how to play Splendor, and this game will be more challenging than most. Experienced Splendor players fall on a continuum between Splendor Gambling and Splendor Economy, and one of the main disadvantages for a Splendor Gambler is that your early strategic reserves tell the other player that you grok the game while also telegraphing your strategy several moves ahead to your opponent.  I may return to the continuum of Splendor Gamblers and Splendor Economists in a future post.

While I’ve had a lot of fun playing the online mobile version of Splendor, I would only recommend it with the caveat that if you are not playing this game on a good WiFi connection, you could find it a frustrating pastime. If you have a rocket fast internet connection (I have Xfinity, which does the trick), and only try to play it at home on that network, you will probably have a great time with online Splendor play. If you’re trying to play through a 3G or 4G connection, you stand a good chance of being disconnected from the server, which the app counts as a loss for the player being disconnected. This is such a pervasive problem that on any given time if you enter the Online section of the app, the chat stream is likely to have one or two players venting about being disconnected.

Also, I should advise players that while I have mentioned in other articles on this blog that the Splendor app fits that five to ten minute sweet spot for a mobile game, that only holds true when you’re playing against AI. When you’re playing in the Online section of the app, even considering the timer running in the background, the games take at least 50% longer, around 15 minutes with an attentive opponent. 

However, even with these two criticisms weighing in, the Splendor app is currently my favorite online tabletop gaming platform, ending a period of several months in which, when I had ten minutes to kill, I would play San Juan or Puerto Rico nearly exclusively.

You can find my review of the tabletop version of Splendor by following this link.

Splendor Board Game


Splendor on Android.

You can find Splendor on iTunes through this link.

Board of Life uses affiliate links.

Bora Bora

Game Night: Bora Bora and Ticket to Ride

On Saturday, we had a short game night with our friends, in which we played Bora Bora for the first time, and also played Ticket To Ride, which we had not played in over a year. The food was great, as usual, with the highlights of the menu being baked tofu sandwiches and a roasted vegetable soup that combined roasted garlic, cauliflower, and potatoes into a kind of creamy stock, though the soup was vegan. The highlight of my week, though, was that I was sitting upright for longer than fifteen minutes, as my recent surgery had required that I be reclining for most of the week.

Bora Bora and the Bora Bora Effect


For the last half dozen game nights, we’ve been focusing on playing games that we already know, as it lets us play more games, but tonight we decided to try a new one. Unfortunately, the game that we learned to play was Bora Bora, which is like the game Puerto Rico—already a Machiavellian pasttime—overinflated with a half dozen house rules pulled from Terra Mystca, Power Grid, and the inscrutable and sadistic games played by Arioch and the Lords of Chaos. While usually I’m down with the maniacal laughter and hand-wringing required to appreciate the most fiendishly convoluted of strategy games, the complexities of Bora Bora were lost on me, as the poorly translated rules were bobbing around in the gas bubble trapped in my left eye by my recent retinal detachment surgery. And, as the discomfort of reading twelve pages of Ravensburger tabletop game instructions apparently exceeds the discomfort of recovering from eye surgery, none of the other players rose to the occasion, and I was still our groups’ de facto game interpreter. Not that I blame anyone for their reluctance to take command over such ambiguous rules; rules which say one thing, while the symbolic task tokens seem to say something else, so that although we played the game accurately according to the written rules, for most of the game we were uneasy with our textual intepretation of it.

When I was a gaming noob, I would sometimes confuse my skill at tabletop games as an appreciation for them, and equate a victory with liking a game, but setting up hundreds of games of Catan not only gave me an honest appreciation of that game, it also helps to peel back the veils from other games. And in this case, winning with a huge lead didn’t soften my antipathy,

And losing obviously didn’t create a bias for the game in our other players, though all of their reactions varied widely: in all six rounds of play, one player begged to be released from Bora Bora so that we could play other games; another grumbled here and there, but since then hindsight has ameliorated her opinion, so that she now says she likes it; and the third—the buyer of the game—cheered louder for the game than a Ravensburger company shill. Of all the games that we have played, this game was the most polarizing, so that I might refer to it in future installments on Board of Life as the Bora Bora Effect—which I’m basically swiping from the Rashomon Effect. If you read the Rasahomon Effect entry on Trope TV, you basically know the Bora Bora Effect: each tabletop game is actually a nexus of shared experience, so that there isn’t just one Catan, there are millions of different Catans, each nuanced differently according to the players of Catan. The main way that the Bora Bora Effect might differ from the Rashomon Effect is that the Bora Bora Effect describes games, which are closed systems, and the Rashomon Effect describes perceptual experience, which it is assumed is less ordered and open-ended. I’m going to resist the sidebar, though, and return to the Bora Bora Effect when our gaming group has a larger selection of polarizing games.

I almost called it the Boring Bora Bora Effect, but spite doesn’t really serve the spirit of inquiry.

To those of you that visit this blog for the strategic takeaways, my main recommendation to you if you want to win Bora Bora is to invest yourself in building your temple as fast as you can, bevause the building blocks of your temple are worth much more in the earlier rounds (10VP eeach) than the later rounds (7VP or 4 VP). Also, if you build the temple entirely, you get a 12 VP bonus—6VP for having a full temple and 6VP for having a finished temple—unlike most other completion bonuses, which are 6 VP. This is on top of the 24 to 60 VP that you get for selecting the Builder role cards over six successive rounds. In addition to often playing Builder, I was able to complete my temple by putting high rolled dice on the Helper role card as often as I could so that I could get the bonus resources for my temple. Other than focusing on building my temple, I used my remaining dice to diversiy my VP investments on the board. Unlike Puerto Rico, you can select a Role card more than once per round, and I did this as many times as I could, prioritizing Builder and Helper, and only investing in other roles when necessary.

Diet Ticket to Ride


Next we moved into Ticket to Ride, which, with Catan, was one of the first games that we played as a group. It was extremely pleasant to return to the world of Ticket to Ride. Something about Ticket to Ride inspires us to be nice to each other in ways that Catan doesn’t, so that while on any of three successive turns I could have interrupted another player’s route, I just didn’t feel like doing it. And, as a point of fact, no player during the entire game deliberately interrupted another’s route just for the sake of doing it. Upon reflection, I feel that we may be ruining the game by being too nice as we play it, so that we’re not really playing Ticket to Ride but a Diet version of it.

Ticket to Ride has many virtues: lightning-fast set-up; speedy play; eminently teachable; multiple winning strategies. If Ticket to Ride went for the viscera like Catan so that it was half as gripping as that game of hexes and dice, we might have played the former more than four times as a group in the last three years. While an inviting game, it’s not very compelling—at leas the way that we currently play it. Because of this, I’m considering resisting my natural inclination to be a nice Ticket to Ride player next time, and blocking every single route that I can, just to see if it makes the game more dynamic and memorable. After some more experimentation—to see how far Ticket to Ride game play can be bent—I’d like to review Ticket to Ride here on Board of Life.

My current takeaway from Ticket to Ride, when players are playing the game nicely, is that the main struggle in the mid game is knowing whether or not you should risk getting new routes, as well as knowing when you should get them or when it is too late to get them. If you’re satisfied with a low number of finished routes, then you need to switch to saving cards in order to buy the biggest routes that you can. That said, if a nice player also decides to be cautious in their investment of routes, it is a very hard game to win.

Here’s what I project: if you’re going to play Ticket to Ride in the nice way, you should invest in a sprawling, easily diversified, series of routes, and get new routes frequently in order to capitalize on that investment. If you’re not going to play Ticket to Ride in the nice way, you should finish your initial routes as quickly as possible, and then spend the rest of the game saving cards so that you can play them strategically in a manner to cut off others’ route investments. This is actually what I had planned on doing going into this game, but as everyone else was playing in the nice way, I decided to play nice as well when the time came.

Conclusion

On the surface, I found Bora Bora to be overcomplicated and torturous, and Ticket to Ride to be enjoyable and gratifying, but bland, but upon reflection, this game night was more fruitful than many others as it has given me pause enough to consider that games have a Rashomon-like separation of individual experiences, and that sharing of the jointly-perceived game may be as important as the playing of the game. On top of that, I have begun to deconstruct the way that we play Ticket to Ride, and I wonder whether long term enjoyment of tabletop games depends on continual examination and deconstruction of their game play.

Bora Bora Strategy Board Game

Ticket to Ride

Board of Life uses affiliate links.  Old school RPG players will find a cool Easter egg in the Arioch hyperlink.

A Little Nap

This is officially the longest break on my blog, and I just wanted to let those of you that have this page bookmarked know the reason for my absence.

Those of you not following my other Twitter account, @k4comicbook, don’t know that I had retinal detachment surgery earlier this week.  As I’ve been just resting  and watching One-Punch Man and Mob Psycho 100 for the most part, as well as a rewatch of Doctor Who series six, I haven’t been playing tabletop games.  I’m looking forward to resuming Board of Life soon.

Catan Blues

Catan Blues: The Catan Review

Catan nee Settlers of Catan

The original name of Catan was Settlers of Catan, and this maiden name is more descriptive of the concept of the game, which focuses not only on the hexagonally modular world of Catan, but also the three to four (or six) players that take the roles of the settlers and carve out a niche for their empire. I use the two names interchangeably, but make no mistake, the transition from Settlers of Catan to Catan demarcates a fundamental change in the way the powers that be would have you view the game. The current Catan product focuses on the game setting, while the game that won the Spiel Des Jahres in 1995 and became one of the most popular and most played games in the world was called Settlers of Catan for good reason, as that title puts the focus on the players that would learn just how compelling it was to eke out a victory with five elemental-like cards building commonalities of colored wood and armies of development cards.

soc_rv_rules_091907-page-003

Wheels Within Wheels; Hexes Within Hexes

Catan looks and sounds simple, but Catan players obtain their victory with several different types of resource and area management. First, the player must control their hand of cards, so that it will every now and then produce the right suits to build roads, settlements, cities, and development cards, while not attracting the blade of the robber; secondly, the player must eke out a space on the island of Catan, when space on the island is at a premium, and the best way to do this is by manipulation of roads and the “rule of one” to parry your competitors’ growth; thirdly, and optionally, a gamblers’ canny understanding of the probabilities of numbers can be an asset when this results in the ability to make this numerical assessment work in their favor, although it can also be a maddening and frustrating liability when the player doesn’t have an equal understanding that statistics in Catan, just as in real life, describe likelihoods and not laws.

Fortunately for those who do not have a grasp on the statistics of rolling two six sided dice, or want to play Catan in the easy-breezy way, the manufacturers have put a shorthand on each of the numbers on the board. Numbers with a higher pip count underscoring the number indicates a higher likelihood of that number being thrown.  The 2 and the 12 only have one pip on them, while the 6 and the 8 have five pips, and this signifies that the 6 and the 8 are five times more likely to be thrown than the 2 and the 12.  Just don’t bet your Catan farm on it.

Despite the wheels within wheels description that I’ve just laid out for you—which is 100% accurate and in no way an exaggeration, though many do play oblivious to these organizational layers—Catan is deceptively easy to play, as all the above game mechanics are concealed inside a simplicity of the highest order.

Catan: Playing By Numbers

In basic Settlers of Catan, the winner is the first Settler to move from two points to ten points. Only eight points are actually scored by the victor, as each player starts with two settlements, each worth a point, as well as two roads, which are worth zero points, but are necessary connectors for building more settlements and future points.

soc_rv_rules_091907-page-005soc_rv_rules_091907-page-004

To build another settlement, you first need to build at least one more road due to the “rule of One”—which should be called the “rule of Two” because it essentially says that settlements must be two hexagonal sides away from each other at bare minimum—and then spend a brick, a lumber, a wheat, and a wool. Each road costs a brick and a lumber as well, so you can see that at least in the early game and in the road building duel that consumes much of the mid-game, brick and lumber are extremely important.

soc_rv_rules_091907-page-005

Another way to score points is to upgrade an existing settlement to a city, which costs three ore and two wheat. Cities are worth two points. As each player only has five settlements in their building supply, worth a total of five points, some upgrading to cities is usually imperative in order to hit ten points. However, each player only has four cities in their supply, so just upgrading settlements to cities won’t win you the game either, as four cities is only eight points. Players that focus on building things to win the game have an assortment of both settlements and cities at the end of the game. Cities also produce twice as many resources as settlements.

soc_rv_rules_091907-page-010

The way resources are produced in Catan goes like this: if you have a settlement bordering a Mountain/Ore hex with the number 4 sitting on it, and 4 is rolled, then you would get one ore resource card, and if you upgrade that settlement to a city, you will get two ore every time a 4 was rolled. It is possible to get more than one resource every time the dice are rolled due to the fact that there are two of every number from three to eleven, with only two and twelve are singular. So if I have a settlement bordering the four ore and a city bordering the four wheat (“four ore,” “six lumber,” and so forth, is the nomenclature we use in our gaming group, and I have the feeling it is fairly universal) and a four is rolled, I get one ore and two wheat.

Resources are produced on every players’ roll, and every one that has a settlement or city bordering the rolled number gets to benefit. This can be one of the frustrating things about Catan—on your own turn, rolling a number that is immensely beneficial to everyone but yourself. What is even more mind-numbing and soul-crushing, of course, is one or two (or three) passes around the board without ANY of your numbers being rolled. Fortunately, this doesn’t happen too often, but every time it does, it makes you want to act like that sibling ot cousin that would flip the Monopoly game board. I wouldn’t do this, though, as Catan is a pretty expensive game, and this might get you banned from your Catan timeshare.

Catan: Road Wars, Development Hell, and Robber Knights

If the Catan rules stopped with the mechanics of production and construction, though the resulting diversion would have immense replay value due to the modular and random nature of both the resource and number tiles, what we would have would be a kind of math game favoring only the mathematically inclined and those lucky at dice. There are, however, some additional point-scoring opportunities, and with these additional factors in the game, there are many winning strategies, and it isn’t so much of a luck and numbers anymore, but a gamers’ paradise. Or a gamers’ hell, or a gamers’ purgatory, depending on your attitude to Catan. To be fair, playing Catan gives you access to all of Dante’s journeys; it just depends on your luck in the particular game.

These additional scoring opportunities include the two point Longest Road card, which is won by the first player with five contiguous roads uninterrupted by another player’s development, and it can only be taken by a player that has exceeded the length of the previous Longest Road; the two point Largest Army card, which is won by the first player with three Knights (see below), and can only be taken when another player exceeds that player’s quantity of Knights; lastly, there are also five victory points in the deck of 25 development cards.

soc_rv_rules_091907-page-005

To buy a development card, you spend a wheat, an ore, and a wool. Development cards are not recycled, which means they are a finite resource for every game. In the deck of 25 Development Cards, there are 14 Knight cards, 5 Victory Points, 2 Road Building cards, 2 Monopoly cards, and 2 Year of Plenty cards. Most of the time (56%) it’s a Knight, but 44% of the time it’s something else, which can occasionally wreak havoc on those players that are counting on getting the Largest Army card to cinch their victory. Not that the other cards aren’t nice—the Road Building card lets you throw down two roads, which can let you block another player or reach a viable building spot; the Monopoly card lets you ask for everyone’s production of one single resource; the victory point cards are the cheapest way to get a victory point in the game; and, the Year of Plenty lets you get any two resources from the bank that you want. On the face of it, the Year of Plenty card seems like a bum deal—you just spent three cards to buy a development card that gives you two—but it’s a better trade rate than the Maritime Trade rule (4:1), and it does give you the exact resources you need at any time. Plus you can save the card until you need it, which means they’re resources that you can hold on to without being a sitting duck for the robber.

Oh? I haven’t introduced that shady gentleman, The Robber, yet? When a player rolls a 7, they move the robber onto any tile, with three consequences: 1) production stops on that tile until the robber is moved again; 2) the robbing player steals a resource from any player with a settlement bordering the blocked tile; and 3), every player with more than 7 cards must discard half of them. This third effect means that veteran Catan players tend to keep their hand as light as possible, and, even when saving for settlements and cities, might, for fear of the robber’s halving blade, buy a road or development card instead, just to prevent saved cards from becoming liabilities. The only way to move the robber other than with a roll of a 7 is to play a Knight card either before or after you roll the dice on your turn. This lets you move the robber immediately, but without the production-destroying third effect above. And yes, it is possible to move the robber twice on one turn, if you’re so lucky as to play a knight card and then roll a 7 too, and you can even do it the other way around if you’re a soul-sucking entity with ancestry in one of the circles of Hell.

Since there aren’t too many rules governing the robber, usually Catan groups develop their own shady practices, such as bribing the player that threw the seven with a card to avoid the robber’s obstructing influence. Since there isn’t a rule prohibiting it, I’m gathering that this is a legal practice, especially considering trade and negotiation rules are the other factor that prevents Catan from becoming math club.

Trading With Banks and Other Bandits

While it is possible to trade in Catan without going to other players, trading with the impartial bank sucks. The rules call this “maritime trade,” and it has a very unfavorable rate of exchange: 4 resources of the same kind for the resource that you want. If you have a settlement bordering a port, you can get a more favorable rate of exchange, depending on the port in question. There are five 3:1 ports, that drop the maritime trade rate from 4:1 to 3:1, and there are also specialty ports that let you trade 2 of one specific resource for 1 of another. So there’s a 2:1 wool port, a 2:1 lumber port and so forth, and these can be game-winning settlements when you have a lot of production of that specialty resource.

If you don’t like either 3:1 or 2:1 exchange rates, though, you can always try trading with other players, and those negotiation terms are whatever you can hash out with that other player. So if you can get someone to trade you a brick and a lumber for two ore, the more power to you. More likely than not, experienced players will try to take advantage of your need, and make you pay more than a 1:1 rate, but they won’t be so usurious as to make you go to the bank.

The only restriction on trade is that you can only trade with the player whose turn it is. The rules don’t specify that the player who just rolled has to initiate trades, only that trades must be between that player and another player, so there’s nothing stopping you from being aggressive and leading with a trade proposal before your competitors come up with one. Also, sometimes you have to be fast: if the trading player says “I have an ore for a wheat,” it’s likely that another player might grab that deal before you if you’re not paying attention.

So You Want to Be a Catan Bastard…

Some other shady but legal practices are 1) initiating trade to discover who has the resource you need so that you can play a Knight and gamble on stealing it without giving up a resource; or, 2) if you have nothing but wheat and a monopoly card, trading away all your wheat to get what you need, and then playing the monopoly card to get it back. The only official restriction on this kind of behavior is that while you can buy as many Development Cards you want every turn, you can only play one per turn. So if you played a Knight card to move the robber at the beginning of the round, you can’t use that Monopoly card too.

Some shady practices that are completely illegal are 1) lying about a dice roll; 2) lying about how many cards are in your hand, or sitting on excess cards, to avoid the robber; 3) during a pause, snatching a few resource cards from the bank or adding a pivotal road to the board; 4) when someone gets up to grab a beer or use the john, swapping their hand with random cards from the bank.

In the interest of having a complete catalog of Catan villiany, please add your Catan Bastard best practices in the comments below!

Your Brain on Catan

So, when it’s your turn, you might have many questions running through your brain:

  1. am I playing a road to block my competitor or get cards out of my hand, or am I saving for a settlement?

  2. am I flipping this Knight card now, or saving it for when my tile is blocked by another player?

  3. am I saving this ore and wheat for a city so I can double my production, or am I buying development cards so as to get the Largest Army advantage or the victory points in the development card deck?

  4. how bad will everyone hate me if I play this monopoly card, and how much worse will they hate me if I take back all the brick I just traded them?

  5. who can I get to trade me a wool?

  6. I’ve been saving for this city for three turns, no one will trade with me, and I have eleven cards now. Do I keep playing chicken with the dice and hold out for that ore I need, or do I cash in these two ore, two wool, and two wheat for two development cards?

  7. I just hit eight victory points. Do I focus on building settlements and cities, or do i channel all my production and trade into road production, so I can steal the Longest Road card and win the game?

  8. My (wife, husband, significant other, boss, best friend, brother, sister) really wants to win this game, and I have nine points on the board and three ore and two wheat in my hand. Do I give up (sex, a happy home, my promotion, two decades of best friend-dom, holiday cheer) to win this one?

While I have no idea exactly how many games of Catan I’ve played, it’s certainly over a hundred with flesh and blood players, as well as another few dozen on the Catan app for iPhone and iPad. What keeps me coming back to the Threefold Island, which at times is Heaven, but just as often is an Inferno of frustration, and mostly is a Purgatorio of waiting for my number to come up?

Catan’s message is a noble one. Unlike Monopoly or Risk, in which all the other players are literally removed from play by being bankrupted or conquered, in Catan, every player stays in the game until the end. And that end isn’t wholly bitter, it’s a bittersweet closure, because each player builds their own discrete development, and while others can interfere or compete with you, they do not do so by tearing down or destroying your work. And even for Catan’s winner, the satisfaction is greater, because your worthy opponents’ might is still evident on the board, and your win seems more worthy as well, while in Monopoly or Risk, having not only trounced everybody but erased their very mettle from the board, the satisfaction is small. Because Catan isn’t an elimination game, the win is a more social and less solitary event, and seems less Pyrrhic and more exciting by being witnessed by all players. Compare that to the games of Monopoly that we played as children, in which vanquished opponents vanish from the table, and it ends with two economic juggernauts wasting most of an evening vying to be the final winner, only to rejoin the other players, who say, “you were still playing that? We lost hours ago, and we’ve been watching movies and The Simpsons.”

The game is called Catan, it isn’t Utopia or Paradisio, and it makes no pretense of being a perfect world. But it is one of the best games this world has to offer, no matter how much I like to bust on it in Catan Blues, and when I hear that someone has never played Catan before, I feel sorry for them. They’re missing out on not only one of the best tabletop games, but one of the generation-defining creations of the past twenty years.

To read more Catan Blues, follow this link.


catan

Board of Life uses affiliate links.

Catan Blues

Catan Blues: The Protracted Unease of Three Player Catan

Though we have three Catan players in our household, we don’t play three player Catan anymore, and only play Catan with four players on game night with our regular gaming group, or, on special occasions (usually holidays), we play the 5-6 Player Expansion. Isn’t it easier and quicker to play with only three players, you ask? Isn’t it just as fun? Absolutely not, and wholeheartedly no.

This flies in the face of conventional wisdom that says Catan takes longer with each additional player, but anyone who has played any three player Catan knows just how long those games can take compared to the more traditional four player model. Three player Catan also seems to drone on for far too long when compared with the 5-6 player Expansion, which has an expanded map of point scoring opportunities and an increased rate of construction due to the Special Building Phase.

Does three player Catan only seem to drag on, or is it actually longer than games with more ambitious player counts?

Catan doesn’t end until enough resources have been produced by dice tosses, which means that—strictly looking at the dice, and ignoring the human factor, which we will see has its own negative impact on game length—the same number of rolls transpire in a three person game as in a four person game, only they are distributed among one fewer players. If the average game of Catan is 60 throws of the dice, then in a four player game each player will roll fifteen times, while in a three player game, each player will roll twenty times, and this substantial increase of each player’s responsibility can lead to game fatigue.

And once you add in the human element, a three player game may require more dice throws than a four player game, because, in addition to each player rolling the dice more times, there are also fewer producers every time the dice is rolled. In a four player game, there are four potential producers with each dice toss, while in a three player game, there are only three, and consequently, 25% less production. True, there are also fewer consumers to compete for these resources, but not every consumer has the same impact on the length of the game. That is, the unlucky player that is producing infrequently and consuming even less frequently due to not having the right combination of resources to build, and hence ending the game with four or five victory points that were eked out agonizingly, affects the game length negatively by making it longer, and the player that is producing frequently, consuming frequently, and trading favorably affects the game length positively by winning as quickly as possible. The winner’s development over time is the primary yardstick for game length, and the losers only contribute to the duration positively by producing and trading the resources that the winner needed. The losers’ own development, while important to them at the time, is either a neutral or negative factor in game length. And in a three player game, compared to a four player game, there are only two other losers aside from the winner, which subtracts from the winner’s potential trade partners.

Not to mention that three player Catan is Robber Hot Potato, as each player will receive the robber more times in a three player game than in a four player game if the number of dice rolls are equal, and many more times if the number of dice rolls are greater in three player Catan. If you accept as givens first that a game of Catan is 60 rolls of the dice, and second that the robber is rolled one in six, that means an average of 10 visits from the robber, which, when shared by three players, is more onerous than when shared by four. And, if the three player game does run longer—let’s say 72 rolls of the dice—then there are twelve visits from the robber shared by three players, or about four each assuming Pangloss‘s perfect world in which Catan players must be fair.

So, if you wonder why the mere thought of playing a three-handed game of Catan fills you with dread, it is probably for the reasons discussed.  I would be interested in generating a sample of three player games to demonstrate conclusively that three player games are longer, except for the fact that it would be a torturous and punitive activity that I would wish only on the grossly impolite. That said, I did find one thread on BoardGameGeek.com in which a player logged four three player games and while one ran 44 turns, the other three ran from 70-80 turns.  

To read earlier installments of Catan Blues, follow this link.

Catan 5th Edition

Catan 5-6 Player Extension – 5th Edition

Warhammer

Reblog: Fantasy Flight Games Gives Up The Games Workshop License

For those of you with any Warhammer miniature, Wathammer RPG, or Wathammer 40k, background, I’d like to share this great breakdown on the separation of Fantasty Flight Games’ abandonment of their Games Workshop license.

Thank the “Hit Somebody” blog for this informative article.  Also, if there’s any FFG Warhammer product that you’ve been considering buying, his advice, that now is the time to buy before the product becomes prohibitively expensive in the resale market, sounds like sage gamers’ wisdom.

Who do you think will be likely to be the next Games Workshop licensee?  What tabletop game publisher do you think can manage the extensive Warhammer products in their catalog?

http://hitsomebody.com/fantasy-flight-games-and-games-workshop-go-separate-ways/#comment-1974


Here’s a dungeon door to all the Warhammer loot…